Health & Safety

Fall 2007
ENVIRONMENTAL & HEALTH IMPACTS OF WATER BOTTLED IN PLASTICS

Fossil fuel consumption. Approximately 1.5 million gallons of oil—enough to run 100,000 cars for a whole year—are used to make plastic water bottles, while transporting these bottles burns thousands more gallons of oil. In addition, the burning of oil and other fossil fuels (which are also used to generate the energy that powers the manufacturing process) emits global warming pollution into the atmosphere.

Water consumption. The growth in bottled water production has increased water extraction in areas near bottling plants, leading to water shortages that affect nearby consumers and farmers. In addition to the millions of gallons of water used in the plastic-making process, two gallons of water are wasted in the purification process for every gallon that goes into the bottles.

Waste. Only about 10 percent of water bottles are recycled, leaving the rest in landfills where it takes thousands of years for the plastic to decompose.

The Simple (and Cheaper) Solution
The next time you feel thirsty, forgo the bottle and turn to the tap. You’ll not only lower your environmental impact but also save money—bottled water can cost up to 10,000 times more per gallon than tap water. And because the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s standards for tap water are more stringent than the Food and Drug Administration’s standards for bottled water, you’ll be drinking water that is just as safe as, or safer than, bottled.

If, however, you don’t like the taste of your tap water or are unsure of its quality, you can buy a filter pitcher or install an inexpensive faucet filter to remove trace chemicals and bacteria. If you will be away from home, fill a reusable bottle from your tap and refill it along the way; travel bottles with built-in filters are also available. Finally, limit your bottled water purchases for those times when you’re traveling in countries where water quality is questionable.

The Health Issues for Baby Bottles
(Summarized from Grist, an online environmental and health magazine whose byline reads, “Gloom and doom with a sense of humor.”)

Most parents discourage their kiddos from ingesting known toxics, so a new study from green group Environment California is a bit of a bummer:  when run through a simulated dishwasher 50 to 75 times, name-brand baby bottles leach the chemical bisphenol A, or BPA, in levels that have caused reproductive abnormalities in lab animals.  Baby-product representatives spun the bottle, calling the report "sensational and biased" and arguing that their products meet federal standards, which really is far from comforting.  Feeling un-comforted, California Assembly member Fiona Ma (D) has introduced a bill to ban children's products containing BPA or toxic plastic softeners called phthalates in the state, mirroring a current San Francisco law. And a group of experts convened by the National Institutes of Health is meeting to review data and conclude whether or not BPA poses health risks to humanfolk -- but the findings, according to an NIH spokesperson, will "not necessarily" be adopted by the feds.

straight to the source: San Francisco Chronicle, Jane Kay, 28 Feb 2007

straight to the source: CNN Money, Reuters, 28 Feb 2007

©2007 Valley Women's Club